Police officers investigating the murder of
Councillor Patsy Kelly 29 years ago have
searched a number of homes in the Trillick,
Ballinamallard and Dromore areas this
week. One of the searches is understood to
have taken place, under warrant, at the
home of a former UDR man near Dromore.Police have refused to give details of the searches, but a spokesman did
confirm that a number of searches did take place, and that ex-UDR men are
being questioned.
“This is a normal course of events and nothing adverse should be read into it,”
said police spokesman.
Speculation has been rife in recent years that members of the UDR were
involved in the murder of Trillick Nationalist Councillor, Patrick Kelly.
A former member of the Regiment, David Jordan, who has since died, is
alleged to have confessed to friends that he was present at the murder.
But the police officer leading the inquiry, speaking for the first time publically
this week, says if no-one can substantiate the allegation then the claim will be
dismissed by the investigation team.
The West Midlands police officer seconded to the PSNI to head the inquiry
into the 1974 murder, Detective Superintendent Andrew Hunter, has warned:
“If we cannot find someone to support the allegations or innuendo, then all I
can do is put it to rest that there was no truth in what was said”. He is
appealing for information from friends and associates who may know anything
about the allegations.
In 1999 it emerged that former member of the Ulster Defence Regiment, David
Jordan, made allegations in a pub that he had been present at Mr. Kelly’s
murder and named a number of individuals who he claimed carried out the
killing. Mr. Jordan died in his early 50s in November 2001.
The Kelly family solicitor, Mr. Pat Fahy, is concerned that police appear to be
“seeking to close down an avenue at this early stage in the inquiry”. He said
that he had previously asked police to consider an exhumation of Mr. Jordan’s
body after correspondence with the pathologist who had conducted the post
mortem. Mr. Fahy said it had been revealed to him that the pathologist had not
been alerted to the possibility that there may be something suspicious about
Mr. Jordan’s death. Had he been told, other tests would have been carried
out, Mr. Fahy said. “We had asked the police to consider exhumation of the
body. We were told by them they had not ruled it out or ruled it in. The police
should be asked why the issue of a possible exhumation is being effectively
ruled out,” he said.
For Mr. Kelly’s family, the claim alleged to have been made by Mr. Jordan had
acted as a catalyst in their search for the truth about what had happened to
their husband and father who disappeared after locking up the Corner Bar in
Trillick on July 24, 1974. He was shot on the Badoney Road as he drove to
the family home at Golan. His body was discovered three weeks later, tied to
weights in Lough Eyes near Lisbellaw.
The investigation into the David Jordan allegation is one of five lines of inquiry
being pursed by Mr. Hunter and his team of 16 police officers, both from within
and outside the PSNI, who are based at Maydown police complex. As an
experienced senior police officer, Mr. Hunter has conducted a number of
murder inquiries as well as a major child abuse inquiry going back to the
1970s.
On Tuesday he visited Omagh Police Station to appeal for help from the local
community. He revealed that some pieces of evidence from the original
inquiry had yet to be found. He also said that while he would not discuss
future lines of inquiry, the police team had not yet questioned former DUP
assembly man, Oliver Gibson. A number of newspapers and television
programmes have claimed that Mr. Gibson has questions to answer. He has
denied any involvement.
At the family home at Golan, Trillick, Teresa Kelly and her family spoke of a
lack of trust in the Hunter inquiry. They are still seeking a judicial review, due
to be heard on September 26 of the PSNI’s decision not to hold an
independent inquiry. “It is the only thing we are going to settle for,” said Mrs.
Kelly.
The on-going police investigation has issued detailed appeals for information
on particular lines of inquiry. Anyone can call to speak to detectives in the
murder investigation incident room on 028 7137 9795.
As Mr. Kelly’s body was recovered from Lough Eyes three weeks after he
disappeared, police want to speak to all boat owners and fishermen who used
Lough Eyes in July and August 1974. They particularly want to hear from
people who remember seeing boats which were damaged, tampered with or
partially submerged.
A white BMW car, registration number 3071 VZ, was stolen some time
between midnight and 3 am on July 25 from Main Street Beragh. Detectives
need to talk to anyone who saw the car being taken, saw it being set on fire at
Fernagharan the same day or who knows anything about the vehicle. Mr.
Hunter refused to reveal the name of the owner of this car as he did not think
“it is very fair”.
Police are appealing for information about Mr. Kelly’s car, a white Mazda
registration number BJI 3154, which was taken from the Badoney Road and
found 10 miles away at Greenhill on the Brookeborough estate.
They are also checking out reports that the two men were spotted on a hillside
overlooking the village on the night of the murder. Officers are appealing to
those two men, or anyone who knows who they were, to come forward.
As to the David Jordan allegations, police would like to speak to anyone who
was present when David Jordan made the allegations or who knows anything
about them.
“I have spoken to the Jordan family,” Mr. Hunter said. “They are upset and
confused and cannot understand why it is being alluded to that David broke
down and made an alleged confession about being present at Mr. Kelly’s
murder. David is not here to defend himself,” he said. He appealed to family,
friends, colleagues or drinking partners to come forward, who may be able to
shed some light on what was said.
Five weeks into Mr. Hunter’s involvement into the investigation, some of the
original exhibits are not at hand. Searches are taking place for some of them.
“It should not be read into it that there is any skullduggery,” he said, pointing to
the elapse of time over 30 years. “I am looking to see what there is,” he said.
Already since the launch last week, house to house inquiries have been
taking place in the village of Trillick.
“I am starting afresh. I have no preconceived ideas. I need to understand what
made Mr. Kelly tick. I know he was family man, who worked for a living. I know
he was a councillor. I need to work out what sort of person he was and to do
that I need to work with the community and with the family. I am alive to the
allegations to how he may have met his death. I have no evidence to support
that at present but I am not ignoring it. The start of any murder inquiry is the
victim,” Mr. Hunter said.
The Kelly family, a possible source for this information, has said it feels
alienated from the inquiry as a result of the way it was launched.
“I have not given up on working with the family. There will always be teething
problems,’ said Mr. Hunter. He declined to discuss any correspondence that
had taken place between himself, the Kelly family or Mr. Fahy. He said that the
family had been aware that there was to be a press launch.
Mrs. Kelly has described last week’s inquiry launch as a “big shock” to her
and her family of five children – Geraldine, Barry, Fearghal, Oonagh and
Patsy. “It was launched without us being told. We all heard in different ways,”
she said. “We were supposed to be kept in touch. Mr. Hunter told us there
would be a press release and one of us would go to the press launch. He was
to have a media launch. The way it came across it was going to be a big thing
with us involved in some way. He had that pencilled in for July 23. Then it
came out and we have never heard tell of him since,” she said. The family had
nominated youngest son Patsy (28), not yet born at the time of his father’s
death in 1974, to take part in the launch.
Her eldest daughter Geraldine heard the news when she visited her in-laws.
“My mother-in-law had heard it on the radio,” she said.
“The approach is we are looking for a full independent inquiry. When we met
Mr. Hunter first of all we gave him the benefit of the doubt. He seemed to be
fairly genuine and the meeting went well. Now he did this. It is very
disappointing,” said her son Barry (33). “He (Mr. Hunter) made such a big
issue about trust at the beginning of the meeting and the first thing he did was
throw trust out the window,” he said.
Mrs. Kelly said that before the launch the family had been prepared to go
along with the inquiry “to see how it would pan out”.
But the launch has upset them. “If this is how it has started, what way is it
going to continue? It is a complete fiasco from the start,” said her son Fearghal
(31).
On hearing about the appeal for more information made by the police on
Tuesday, the Kelly family felt there was nothing new in the lines of inquiry. “I
don’t see a pile of difference at the end of the day. I see nothing new in that.
They were lines they should have been going down in 1974,” said Barry.
The family has its own ideas about what happened to Mr. Kelly. “When he
was carrying money he said the only person he would stop for is security. I
think myself it had to be a red light that went up that night for him to stop. He
had been stopped there in previous weeks before it and by the UDR and
when he came home he himself seemed suspicious about that night,” Mrs.
Kelly said. “The very fact that the body and the car were moved from Badoney
Road to Brookeborough and Lough Eyes, there had to be security force
involvement. At the time there was big security force activity. It would be
unbelievable to move to Brookeborough without coming across a checkpoint,”
said Barry.
“The difficult thing is now that the five of my family are going through the
torture and pain that I went through at the beginning,” said Mrs. Kelly.
Mr. Kelly’s children want to be in a position that they can answer the questions
that their own children will inevitably ask about their father as they grow older.
“Barry has a wee boy and I have my three and it would be nice to have some
sort of answers when they are old enough to ask what happened, who, what
and why,” said Geraldine.
The elder sons talk of feeling as if they have been treated with “no respect”
and as “second class”. “You feel as if you have no rights to answers, that we
should not get answers from these people, the people who are supposed to
be providing them,” said Fearghal.
But they believe that the answers won’t come through the police inquiry. “If
there is a result it will be a big surprise, looking at the way it has started off,”
he added.